Re: XMLHttpRequest test suite suggestion

On Fri, 22 Sep 2006 16:41:12 -0000, Boris Zbarsky <bzbarsky@mit.edu> wrote:
> That doesn't answer my question above.  It just shifts the burden onto  
> defining what "the window from which you use the constructor" means.

Can you point out the problem in that definition?


> Could we have a definition in terms of things defined in the ECMA  
> specification or something?  One that would be completely unambiguous?   
> I'm getting pretty tired of definition-by-example, especially without an  
> exhaustive example set.

Well, I don't like definition-by-example at all and was trying to define  
something that wasn't. It's not really clear to me what the problem with  
the definition is.


-- 
Anne van Kesteren
<http://annevankesteren.nl/>
<http://www.opera.com/>

Received on Friday, 22 September 2006 21:13:05 UTC