- From: Charles McCathieNevile <chaals@opera.com>
- Date: Sun, 26 Feb 2006 13:38:06 +0100
- To: "Matthew Raymond" <mattraymond@earthlink.net>, "Jim Ley" <jim@jibbering.com>
- Cc: "Web APIs WG" <public-webapi@w3.org>
On Sun, 26 Feb 2006 06:55:48 +0100, Matthew Raymond
<mattraymond@earthlink.net> wrote:
> As for "wheel" versus "scroll", I think "scroll" is more
> device-independent, but I don't really care enough to argue about it...
Right. I've been around this issue before, with click vs activate. Living
with a name that sounds odd is much better than waiting 7 years to change
things, and then discovering that you have to live with a funny name to
support the actual content out there.
Picking a name that will work is doomed to failure in the long run, so
worrying too much about it is not the most useful way to spend our time.
> We still need to reconcile the event property names and scale. IE
> uses "wheelDelta", while Mozilla uses "detail", plus the values returned
> by the two are something like this:
> IEEvent.wheelDelta = MozEvent.detail * -40
> So I guess there are still some technical matters to debate.
Right...
cheers
Chaals
--
Charles McCathieNevile chaals@opera.com
hablo español - je parle français - jeg lærer norsk
Peek into the kitchen: http://snapshot.opera.com/
Received on Sunday, 26 February 2006 12:38:23 UTC