- From: Charles McCathieNevile <chaals@opera.com>
- Date: Sun, 26 Feb 2006 13:38:06 +0100
- To: "Matthew Raymond" <mattraymond@earthlink.net>, "Jim Ley" <jim@jibbering.com>
- Cc: "Web APIs WG" <public-webapi@w3.org>
On Sun, 26 Feb 2006 06:55:48 +0100, Matthew Raymond <mattraymond@earthlink.net> wrote: > As for "wheel" versus "scroll", I think "scroll" is more > device-independent, but I don't really care enough to argue about it... Right. I've been around this issue before, with click vs activate. Living with a name that sounds odd is much better than waiting 7 years to change things, and then discovering that you have to live with a funny name to support the actual content out there. Picking a name that will work is doomed to failure in the long run, so worrying too much about it is not the most useful way to spend our time. > We still need to reconcile the event property names and scale. IE > uses "wheelDelta", while Mozilla uses "detail", plus the values returned > by the two are something like this: > IEEvent.wheelDelta = MozEvent.detail * -40 > So I guess there are still some technical matters to debate. Right... cheers Chaals -- Charles McCathieNevile chaals@opera.com hablo español - je parle français - jeg lærer norsk Peek into the kitchen: http://snapshot.opera.com/
Received on Sunday, 26 February 2006 12:38:23 UTC