- From: Jon Ferraiolo <jferrai@us.ibm.com>
- Date: Wed, 20 Dec 2006 13:47:10 -0800
- To: "Robert Sayre" <sayrer@gmail.com>
- Cc: <public-webapi@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <OF6F0E677E.BA003776-ON8825724A.0076D7EF-8825724A.0077ACF4@us.ibm.com>
Hi Robert,
FWIW - Dojo's function is actually [window.]dojo.byId() and I believe that
Yahoo's is [window.]YAHOO.util.get().
Jon
Jon Ferraiolo <jferrai@us.ibm.com>
Web Architect, Emerging Technologies
IBM, Menlo Park, CA
Mobile: +1-650-926-5865
"Robert Sayre"
<sayrer@gmail.com
> To
Sent by: "Jim Ley" <jim@jibbering.com>
public-webapi-req cc
uest@w3.org "Chris Wilson"
<Chris.Wilson@microsoft.com>, "Ian
Hickson" <ian@hixie.ch>, "Dave
12/20/2006 11:10 Massy" <dave.massy@microsoft.com>,
AM "Anne van Kesteren"
<annevk@opera.com>, "Web API WG
(public)" <public-webapi@w3.org>
Subject
Re: Selectors API naming
On 12/20/06, Jim Ley <jim@jibbering.com> wrote:
>
> No, one group of JS programmers do that, it is not representative of the
> entire industry at all
Mappings to getElementById in some popular JS libraries:
Yahoo UI: get()
Prototype.js: $()
MochiKit: $()
dojo: byId()
etc, etc.
I guess that's the nice thing about getElementsBySelector. It's like
picking 6 names all at once. :)
--
Robert Sayre
Attachments
- image/gif attachment: graycol.gif
- image/gif attachment: pic28349.gif
- image/gif attachment: ecblank.gif
Received on Wednesday, 20 December 2006 22:02:26 UTC