- From: Jon Ferraiolo <jferrai@us.ibm.com>
- Date: Wed, 20 Dec 2006 13:47:10 -0800
- To: "Robert Sayre" <sayrer@gmail.com>
- Cc: <public-webapi@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <OF6F0E677E.BA003776-ON8825724A.0076D7EF-8825724A.0077ACF4@us.ibm.com>
Hi Robert, FWIW - Dojo's function is actually [window.]dojo.byId() and I believe that Yahoo's is [window.]YAHOO.util.get(). Jon Jon Ferraiolo <jferrai@us.ibm.com> Web Architect, Emerging Technologies IBM, Menlo Park, CA Mobile: +1-650-926-5865 "Robert Sayre" <sayrer@gmail.com > To Sent by: "Jim Ley" <jim@jibbering.com> public-webapi-req cc uest@w3.org "Chris Wilson" <Chris.Wilson@microsoft.com>, "Ian Hickson" <ian@hixie.ch>, "Dave 12/20/2006 11:10 Massy" <dave.massy@microsoft.com>, AM "Anne van Kesteren" <annevk@opera.com>, "Web API WG (public)" <public-webapi@w3.org> Subject Re: Selectors API naming On 12/20/06, Jim Ley <jim@jibbering.com> wrote: > > No, one group of JS programmers do that, it is not representative of the > entire industry at all Mappings to getElementById in some popular JS libraries: Yahoo UI: get() Prototype.js: $() MochiKit: $() dojo: byId() etc, etc. I guess that's the nice thing about getElementsBySelector. It's like picking 6 names all at once. :) -- Robert Sayre
Attachments
- image/gif attachment: graycol.gif
- image/gif attachment: pic28349.gif
- image/gif attachment: ecblank.gif
Received on Wednesday, 20 December 2006 22:02:26 UTC