Re: Liason statement from JSR 280: WheelEvent and ProgressEvent usage

Dear Ellen and colleagues,

> ... the interfaces under discussion (WheelEvent and ProgressEvent) were  
> an attempt to take the interfaces needed by 290 and/or 287 from
> the uDOM specification and align them with pre-existing DOM 3
> UIEvent types by adding the init and initNS methods.
>
> Finally, it seems that you already have a MouseMultiWheelEvent in  
> process that is a superset of the WheelEvent interface that we are
> proposing.

following our joint meeting with the SVG working group a couple of weeks  
ago, we have agreed that we will publish a draft of the ProgressEvent as  
soon as possible - hopefully that will be available this week and formally  
published in the next week or so.

The MouseMultiWheelEvent is for the case where there are multiple wheels  
in play. We agreed that the MouseWheel event as being specified would be  
appropriate for the JSR and SVG working groups.

The current draft is at  
<http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/~checkout~/2006/webapi/DOM-Level-3-Events/html/DOM3-Events.html?rev=1.8&content-type=text/html;%20charset=iso-8859-1#events-Events-eventgroupings-mousewheelevents>  
based on the proposal at  
http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/~checkout~/2006/webapi/DOM-Level-3-Events/proposals/mousewheel.txt?rev=1.4&content-type=text/plain

Best regards

for the Web API working Group

Charles McCathieNevile, chair

-- 
   Charles McCathieNevile, Opera Software: Standards Group
   hablo español  -  je parle français  -  jeg lærer norsk
chaals@opera.com          Try Opera 9 now! http://opera.com

Received on Sunday, 10 December 2006 09:30:22 UTC