- From: Karl Pongratz <karlhp@karlhp.com>
- Date: Mon, 21 Nov 2005 21:03:40 +0200
- To: Anne van Kesteren <annevk@opera.com>
- CC: public-webapi@w3.org
There is yet the question if pushState() requires to execute JavaScript to display the altered document. In case that the document DOM must me recreated by the developer it sounds similar to an onload event handler. If I remember correctly Eric Costello mentioned somewhere that such an approach causes timing problems. As more complex the DOM of a document as more problems it probably causes. Does pushState() solve this problem? Anne van Kesteren wrote: > On Sun, 20 Nov 2005 10:37:05 +0100, Karl Pongratz <karlhp@karlhp.com> > wrote: > >> However, the WebForms and WebApplications draft specification goes >> far beyond that and will probably require a huge effort to be >> implemented compared to a single document.save() or similar function. > > > Well, the extensions to the History object could be implemented > separately. There has been some talk on the WHATWG mailing list > already to extend the pushState() method in such a way that it would > accept a second argument, an identifier, but a clear proposal for > that that does not interfer with security et cetera has not yet been > made. > > (And lots of what is in those drafts is actually specifying what > browsers have implemented already. There are new features as well, > but those are mostly based on existing implementations et cetera.) > >
Received on Monday, 21 November 2005 19:04:37 UTC