- From: Lachlan Hunt <lachlan.hunt@lachy.id.au>
- Date: Sun, 20 Nov 2005 12:13:09 +1100
- To: Karl Pongratz <karlhp@karlhp.com>
- CC: public-webapi@w3.org
Karl Pongratz wrote: > Yes, I alter the page content! A table with 20 rows is different than a > table with 100 rows, so I think the content is altered. Isn't it? The > additional table rows are generated via DOM scripting. Yes, I know the page content is altered. I never said it wasn't. > The reason that I change the URI is My point was that if you change the URI (e.g. by calling window.location.href = "...";), then that will load a new document, not just alter the current page. If that is not what occurs, could you please elaborate. > b.) IMPORTANT. If the user calls the document with the 100 rows through > the web browser history and than clicks the web browser Reload button > then the server needs to know that the requested resource is a table > document with 100 rows. That's only possible if the URI has changed. The URI is one way to remember the state, another is with a session cookie from which the server can lookup the user's current state. > So it is probably not #pushstate or is it? I don't know, you haven't expressed yourself clearly enough for me to determine for sure whether it is or not, but I believe it is. -- Lachlan Hunt http://lachy.id.au/
Received on Sunday, 20 November 2005 01:13:41 UTC