- From: Anders Rundgren <anders.rundgren@telia.com>
- Date: Thu, 17 Oct 2013 12:01:51 +0200
- To: Mete Balcą <Mete.Balci@pozitron.com>
- CC: "public-web-security@w3.org" <public-web-security@w3.org>
On 2013-10-17 11:16, Mete Balcą wrote: > Hello Virginie and Dominique, > > I am also very interested on the topic -mobile security- and available for any discussion. > I think one of the difficulties here is also that by saying native we sometimes/mostly refer > to an hardware component or a software function with hardware support. Since I guess > the standard cannot be based on a specific hardware feature, I believe some and correct > level of abstraction is needed based on, as Dominique pointed out, the gaps seen by different > industries, so the spec may not directly depend on whatever hardware there is, but the > security concepts that is introduced by having such software/hardware components in the system. Hi Mete, This should be of interest: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-sysapps/2013Oct/0024.html A question arises: Can you actually abstract a security element API and still maintain end-to-end security? Cheers, Anders
Received on Thursday, 17 October 2013 10:02:27 UTC