- From: Philip Jägenstedt <foolip@chromium.org>
- Date: Wed, 29 Mar 2017 15:31:04 +0000
- To: Rick Byers <rbyers@google.com>, Philippe Le Hégaret <plh@w3.org>
- Cc: "public-web-perf@w3.org" <public-web-perf@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <CAARdPYeHGhKJgdLu6HfDv2LSGiFx1Pkj5Zf+xMzVx9kBO1hJ1A@mail.gmail.com>
I'd love to see this as well, everywhere! It was a genuine surprise to us when adopting it for HTML how well it worked out, and now it's hard to imagine going back. It does require a strong cooperation between spec editor and implementers, if there isn't a sense of shared responsibility, then it'll not be as great I think. On Wed, Mar 29, 2017 at 11:35 PM Rick Byers <rbyers@google.com> wrote: > I'd (unsurprisingly) love to see this! > > Note that when new features ship in blink we're now asking people > <https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/forum/#!searchin/blink-dev/web-platform-tests%7Csort:relevance/blink-dev/leQDM4nhGHA/Gy5LHezwCAAJ> > to explain any cases where web exposed behavior does not have > web-platform-tests. So we expect writing web-platform-tests to > increasingly be part of any blink implementation. Hopefully that means > this is less of a burden on spec editors than it might first seem (and > ultimately less of a burden on engine developers since we get to share most > of this work across companies and do less engine-specific test work). > > Rick > > On Wed, Mar 29, 2017 at 10:24 AM, Philippe Le Hégaret <plh@w3.org> wrote: > > Our specifications and our tests are out of sync. Most often, the tests > are behind (eg Beacon) and sometimes, the tests are ahead (eg User Timing). > This is costing us dearly in the long run imho (eg TAO, > user-timing/mark/measure). > > I'd like to propose that the Working Group adopts a dual spec/testing > process, similar to the one applied in the pointer events working group [1] > and the whatwg [2]: > > [[ > Normative spec changes are generally expected to have a corresponding pull > request in web-platform-test. Outstanding test work is tracked via issues > in this repository and issues generally remain open until both spec and > test changes land. If one PR is approved but the other needs more work, add > the 'do not merge yet' label or, in web-platform-tests, the > 'status:needs-spec-decision' label. > ]] > > wdyt? > > Philippe > > > > [1] https://github.com/w3c/pointerevents/blob/gh-pages/README.markdown > [2] https://github.com/whatwg/meta/blob/master/TEAM.md > > >
Received on Wednesday, 29 March 2017 15:31:48 UTC