W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-web-perf@w3.org > March 2017

Re: Adopting a dual spec/testing process for webperf specs

From: Yoav Weiss <yoav@yoav.ws>
Date: Thu, 30 Mar 2017 19:45:32 +0000
Message-ID: <CACj=BEioKPvzujnt+dZy30XJ6FVktO16gAaEzZt-u6RVydTaQA@mail.gmail.com>
To: Philip Jägenstedt <foolip@chromium.org>, Rick Byers <rbyers@google.com>, Philippe Le Hégaret <plh@w3.org>
Cc: "public-web-perf@w3.org" <public-web-perf@w3.org>
I support that proposal as well.

On Wed, Mar 29, 2017 at 11:33 AM Philip Jägenstedt <foolip@chromium.org>

> I'd love to see this as well, everywhere! It was a genuine surprise to us
> when adopting it for HTML how well it worked out, and now it's hard to
> imagine going back. It does require a strong cooperation between spec
> editor and implementers, if there isn't a sense of shared responsibility,
> then it'll not be as great I think.
> On Wed, Mar 29, 2017 at 11:35 PM Rick Byers <rbyers@google.com> wrote:
> I'd (unsurprisingly) love to see this!
> Note that when new features ship in blink we're now asking people
> <https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/forum/#!searchin/blink-dev/web-platform-tests%7Csort:relevance/blink-dev/leQDM4nhGHA/Gy5LHezwCAAJ>
> to explain any cases where web exposed behavior does not have
> web-platform-tests.  So we expect writing web-platform-tests to
> increasingly be part of any blink implementation.  Hopefully that means
> this is less of a burden on spec editors than it might first seem (and
> ultimately less of a burden on engine developers since we get to share most
> of this work across companies and do less engine-specific test work).
> Rick
> On Wed, Mar 29, 2017 at 10:24 AM, Philippe Le Hégaret <plh@w3.org> wrote:
> Our specifications and our tests are out of sync. Most often, the tests
> are behind (eg Beacon) and sometimes, the tests are ahead (eg User Timing).
> This is costing us dearly in the long run imho (eg TAO,
> user-timing/mark/measure).
> I'd like to propose that the Working Group adopts a dual spec/testing
> process, similar to the one applied in the pointer events working group [1]
> and the whatwg [2]:
> [[
> Normative spec changes are generally expected to have a corresponding pull
> request in web-platform-test. Outstanding test work is tracked via issues
> in this repository and issues generally remain open until both spec and
> test changes land. If one PR is approved but the other needs more work, add
> the 'do not merge yet' label or, in web-platform-tests, the
> 'status:needs-spec-decision' label.
> ]]
> wdyt?
> Philippe
> [1] https://github.com/w3c/pointerevents/blob/gh-pages/README.markdown
> [2] https://github.com/whatwg/meta/blob/master/TEAM.md
Received on Thursday, 30 March 2017 19:46:16 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Thursday, 30 March 2017 19:46:17 UTC