- From: Shubhie Panicker <panicker@google.com>
- Date: Fri, 7 Apr 2017 12:58:45 -0700
- To: Boris Zbarsky <bzbarsky@mit.edu>
- Cc: "public-web-perf@w3.org" <public-web-perf@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <CAK7ODi-5=LuOxaC32iJNZq0iQcK93tpeOmATEvEQYH2A2kYtgQ@mail.gmail.com>
Sorry you've had a bad experience Boris. I just wanted to share a small data point here as another implementor: our team (Chrome) recently implemented Navigation Timing 2 and had a very different experience as implementors (we were *not* spec editors) We had several questions and needed many clarifications on the spec, we filed bugs on the spec github repo and received good turnaround times (typically within a day). So while the specs needed some work, our concerns were promptly addressed. Just sharing so other implementors have another (small) data point. On Tue, Apr 4, 2017 at 8:41 AM, Boris Zbarsky <bzbarsky@mit.edu> wrote: > Dear all, > > I find myself unable to participate effectively in this working group. My > repeated attempts to prod people to make the specifications this group > produces actually usable by implementors who are not themselves editors of > those specifications have been met with platitudes and stonewalling for > years now. There is no benefit to be gained, from my point of view, in > continuing to try to roll this rock up the hill. > > I filed https://github.com/w3c/navigation-timing/issues/65 this morning; > it's a tip-of-the-iceberg kind of look at the kinds of systemic problems > the specifications this working group produces have. > > I am unsubscribing from this list, effective immediately. > > My regrets, > Boris > >
Received on Friday, 7 April 2017 19:59:19 UTC