RE: [ResourcePriorities] Scripts and integration with HTML spec

On Wed, 19 Mar 2014, Tobin Titus wrote:
>
> Resource Priorities is in the Web Performance Working Group charter. As 
> a working group, we have been making significant progress here and I 
> even have some more changes in flight per our last discussion. We have 
> all of the right performance people and browser vendors involved in the 
> conversation here and, while I was not there, I have the notes that show 
> this was discussed at TPAC extensively as well.  We want to have one 
> spec where we address the end-to-end problem. One we feel that our 
> solution addresses the performance issue, we can consider if it makes 
> sense to incorporate our fixes into the HTML 5.1 spec.
> 
> That said, we should remain consistent so if there is a conflict with 
> <script> I am happy to resolve those conflicts in this spec.
> 
> Ian, If you have use cases that we have not accounted for, particularly 
> those with script, please send them so I can incorporate them. As 
> always, you're more than welcome to work with us here in the Web 
> Performance Working Group.

Oh. This seems to contradict what Arvind said.

I'm fine either way. I just need to know what's going on. Until Arvind 
just replied yesterday, there had been no reply to my e-mail from 
December:

   http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-web-perf/2013Dec/0061.html

If this group is going to continue its work on HTML, rather than it being 
done in the HTML spec, then we should go back to that e-mail and discuss 
the points I raised in there in more detail, so that I know how we're 
going to address them and so that we can more closely coordinate extensions.

Cheers,
-- 
Ian Hickson               U+1047E                )\._.,--....,'``.    fL
http://ln.hixie.ch/       U+263A                /,   _.. \   _\  ;`._ ,.
Things that are impossible just take longer.   `._.-(,_..'--(,_..'`-.;.'

Received on Wednesday, 19 March 2014 02:22:14 UTC