- From: Jatinder Mann <jmann@microsoft.com>
- Date: Sat, 28 Sep 2013 00:57:10 +0000
- To: Erik Dahlstrom <ed@opera.com>, "public-web-perf@w3.org" <public-web-perf@w3.org>
- CC: "www-svg@w3.org" <www-svg@w3.org>
> I'm wondering why section 4.4 "Elements capable of downloading resources" > [1] doesn't mention in particular the <svg:image> element. I have added <svg:image> in Section 4.5.10. > There are a few other svg elements that may have external content similar to > the image element, such as <svg:use>, <svg:script> and <svg:tref>. I have also added those elements to the spec as well. > It would be nice if the spec would reference SVG 1.1 (or SVG2 depending on your timeframe). I have referenced SVG 1.1 in the spec. If you find that there are any other missing elements or mistakes in the spec regarding SVG, please do provide feedback. Thanks! -----Original Message----- From: Erik Dahlstrom [mailto:ed@opera.com] Sent: Friday, September 13, 2013 6:58 AM To: public-web-perf@w3.org Cc: www-svg@w3.org Subject: [ResourcePriorities] missing svg elements Hello web-perf, I'm wondering why section 4.4 "Elements capable of downloading resources" [1] doesn't mention in particular the <svg:image> element. There are a few other svg elements that may have external content similar to the image element, such as <svg:use>, <svg:script> and <svg:tref>. It would be nice if the spec would reference SVG 1.1 (or SVG2 depending on your timeframe). [1] https://dvcs.w3.org/hg/webperf/raw-file/tip/specs/ResourcePriorities/Overview.html#the-elements -- Erik Dahlstrom, Core Technology Developer, Opera Software Co-Chair, W3C SVG Working Group Personal blog: http://my.opera.com/macdev_ed
Received on Saturday, 28 September 2013 00:58:03 UTC