- From: Arvind Jain <arvind@google.com>
- Date: Thu, 14 Nov 2013 14:07:31 -0800
- To: Chase Douglas <chase@newrelic.com>
- Cc: "Reitbauer, Alois" <Alois.Reitbauer@compuware.com>, "public-web-perf@w3.org" <public-web-perf@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <CAOYaDdNbO5K4Wx91tidYMjutWkLvfh4gAdjfr734k9zTKtfEbg@mail.gmail.com>
Yes that's fine but how do we actually compress from Javascript? On Thu, Nov 14, 2013 at 2:04 PM, Chase Douglas <chase@newrelic.com> wrote: > Do you mean what compression algorithm? If so, I'd say gzip, just like is > used for compressing server responses back to UAs. > > Or are you meaning something else? > > > > On Thu, Nov 14, 2013 at 1:57 PM, Arvind Jain <arvind@google.com> wrote: > >> OK. Dumb question: how do we compress the payload in sendBeacon() >> (assuming we know the server can handle it)? >> >> >> On Thu, Nov 14, 2013 at 9:57 AM, Chase Douglas <chase@newrelic.com>wrote: >> >>> I don't think it makes sense to require gzip. The UA can denote whether >>> gzip is used by setting the Content-Encoding header. As for whether the UA >>> knows if the server accepts gzip encoding or not, I think that's simply >>> covered by the fact that the javascript code must already know how to >>> encapsulate data that is transmitted to the server. This doesn't seem any >>> different from knowing whether to send XML or JSON or plaintext. >>> >>> >>> On Wed, Nov 13, 2013 at 7:51 PM, Arvind Jain <arvind@google.com> wrote: >>> >>>> Could we make accepting gzipped body a requirement for a server >>>> supporting Beacon? >>>> >>>> Arvind >>>> >>>> >>>> On Wed, Nov 13, 2013 at 5:23 PM, Reitbauer, Alois < >>>> Alois.Reitbauer@compuware.com> wrote: >>>> >>>>> Would make sense. However, the user agent does not know whether the >>>>> beacon server accepts gzip encoding. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Alois Reitbauer | Technical Product Manager | Compuware APM >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> ------------------------------ >>>>> *From:* Chase Douglas <chase@newrelic.com> >>>>> *Sent:* Wednesday, November 13, 2013 5:42 PM >>>>> *To:* Reitbauer, Alois >>>>> *Cc:* public-web-perf@w3.org >>>>> *Subject:* Re: [Beacon] Review of current spec >>>>> >>>>> On Tue, Nov 12, 2013 at 7:09 PM, Reitbauer, Alois < >>>>> Alois.Reitbauer@compuware.com> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> Size Limits: >>>>>> >>>>>> We set the size limit to 10k, waiting for feedback whether >>>>>> analytics tools need more. >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Is it possible to add an option to have the UA compress the data >>>>> with gzip before sending? The UA obviously can receive gzip compressed >>>>> data, so why not also optimize message sizes on transmission? >>>>> The contents of this e-mail are intended for the named addressee >>>>> only. It contains information that may be confidential. Unless you are the >>>>> named addressee or an authorized designee, you may not copy or use it, or >>>>> disclose it to anyone else. If you received it in error please notify us >>>>> immediately and then destroy it. Compuware Austria GmbH (registration >>>>> number FN 91482h) is a company registered in Vienna whose registered office >>>>> is at 1120 Wien, Austria, Am Euro Platz 2 / Gebäude G. >>>>> >>>> >>>> >>> >> >
Received on Thursday, 14 November 2013 22:08:00 UTC