W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-web-perf@w3.org > November 2013

RE: [Beacon] spec feedback + few suggestions

From: Jatinder Mann <jmann@microsoft.com>
Date: Fri, 8 Nov 2013 17:38:33 +0000
To: Jonas Sicking <jonas@sicking.cc>
CC: Chase Douglas <chase@newrelic.com>, Ilya Grigorik <igrigorik@google.com>, "Austin, Daniel" <daaustin@paypal.com>, public-web-perf <public-web-perf@w3.org>
Message-ID: <fedf626c37874b71b4ebf146577793e9@BLUPR03MB065.namprd03.prod.outlook.com>
On Thur, Nov 8, 2013 at 5:43 PM, Jonas Sicking <jonas@sicking.cc> wrote:
> I definitely think that if the timeout is reached, we should drop the message on the floor and 
> *not* notify the page. So it should be a mechanism for doing retries. I.e. the timeout means 
> "the data is useless after this point", not "need to try something else after this point".

I see. I misunderstood the timeout as a means to retry on the developer side. I think it's fair to allow a timeout argument after which the user agent will not try to resend. This is of course assuming user agents will continue to retry for such a duration. The spec currently doesn't define or recommend how often the user agent should retry. I'll propose some recommendation language here.

Received on Friday, 8 November 2013 17:39:07 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:04:37 UTC