- From: Arvind Jain <arvind@google.com>
- Date: Thu, 2 May 2013 12:28:30 -0700
- To: Boris Zbarsky <bzbarsky@mit.edu>
- Cc: Jatinder Mann <jmann@microsoft.com>, "public-web-perf@w3.org" <public-web-perf@w3.org>
Received on Thursday, 2 May 2013 19:28:57 UTC
OK I'll write up something to this effect. Last question: what should performance.navigation value be for initial about:blank? Does it need to be specifically defined or is the current text ok? Arvind On Wed, May 1, 2013 at 10:03 PM, Boris Zbarsky <bzbarsky@mit.edu> wrote: > On 5/2/13 12:54 AM, Arvind Jain wrote: > >> We can special case "initial about:blank" page in the navigationStart >> definition - not a big deal. But could you look at the spec and see if >> it makes sense when we have a page that was not navigated to? >> > > I haven't read the processing model in detail in a while, honestly. But > last I checked, the processing model only runs during navigation, so > wouldn't ever get triggered for the initial about:blank. > > > It'd be great if you could suggest the actual wording to incorporate the >> "initial about:blank" page such that the entire spec makes sense. >> > > The simplest thing to do is to define somewhere that when the initial > about:blank is constructed it gets a performance.timing with certain values > in it. This shouldn't need to affect the "when navigation happens" > processing model in any way. > > -Boris >
Received on Thursday, 2 May 2013 19:28:57 UTC