- From: Anne van Kesteren <annevk@opera.com>
- Date: Wed, 22 Feb 2012 15:59:21 +0100
- To: public-web-perf@w3.org
On Wed, 22 Feb 2012 15:52:33 +0100, Boris Zbarsky <bzbarsky@mit.edu> wrote: > Unless there are _very_ strong reasons to restrict to functions only > (which I just don't see in this case), it's better to use a callback > interface for the animation callback. That allows for more flexibility > for authors; they can of course still pass in functions. Ms2ger raised this a few hours ago. I objected and pointed out http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-script-coord/2011OctDec/0368.html We've had a long discussion on this and decided to simplify callbacks. Web IDL also states: "Specification authors SHOULD NOT define callback interfaces that have only a single operation, unless required to describe the requirements of existing APIs. Instead, a callback is to be used." -- Anne van Kesteren http://annevankesteren.nl/
Received on Wednesday, 22 February 2012 14:59:54 UTC