Re: review of Navigation Timing's use of Web IDL

On Fri, Mar 18, 2011 at 9:12 AM, Jonas Sicking <jonas@sicking.cc> wrote:
> The way things are specced now something like:
>
> performance = "hi";
>
> Throws since "hi" isn't a Performance object. Instead the property
> should be marked readonly and replaceable.

Yep, that's the intent. Neither the Chrome or IE implementations throw
on the above snippet, we just need to capture it properly in
IDL-speak. Zhiheng, it sounds like we need to update it to
readonly+replaceable?

Received on Friday, 18 March 2011 16:29:15 UTC