Re: review of Navigation Timing's use of Web IDL

   Yes, it tells what we want much better. I've updated the working draft.

thanks,
Zhiheng

On Fri, Mar 18, 2011 at 9:28 AM, Tony Gentilcore <tonyg@google.com> wrote:

> On Fri, Mar 18, 2011 at 9:12 AM, Jonas Sicking <jonas@sicking.cc> wrote:
> > The way things are specced now something like:
> >
> > performance = "hi";
> >
> > Throws since "hi" isn't a Performance object. Instead the property
> > should be marked readonly and replaceable.
>
> Yep, that's the intent. Neither the Chrome or IE implementations throw
> on the above snippet, we just need to capture it properly in
> IDL-speak. Zhiheng, it sounds like we need to update it to
> readonly+replaceable?
>