- From: Jonas Sicking <jonas@sicking.cc>
- Date: Fri, 18 Mar 2011 09:12:15 -0700
- To: Tony Gentilcore <tonyg@google.com>
- Cc: "public-web-perf@w3.org" <public-web-perf@w3.org>, Cameron McCormack <cam@mcc.id.au>
The way things are specced now something like: performance = "hi"; Throws since "hi" isn't a Performance object. Instead the property should be marked readonly and replaceable. / Jonas On Friday, March 18, 2011, Tony Gentilcore <tonyg@google.com> wrote: >> (I think the attribute should be read only, too, if it doesn’t make >> sense to be able to assign to window.performance.) > > We actually debated this quite a bit and decided it best to avoid > readonly since performance is a common English word and existing sites > might be using var performance or window.performance for their own > purpose. > > Some more discussion: > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-web-perf/2010Dec/0027.html > >
Received on Friday, 18 March 2011 16:19:06 UTC