- From: Anne van Kesteren <annevk@opera.com>
- Date: Sat, 23 Jul 2011 19:58:51 -0700
- To: "Philippe Le Hegaret" <plh@w3.org>
- Cc: public-web-perf@w3.org
On Sat, 23 Jul 2011 15:29:42 -0700, Philippe Le Hegaret <plh@w3.org> wrote: > On Fri, 2011-07-22 at 23:11 +0200, Anne van Kesteren wrote: >> 4. I think it would be better if the DOM dependency was on >> http://dvcs.w3.org/hg/domcore/raw-file/tip/Overview.html as that is what >> we want implementors to implement. > > Ideally yes, but that spec won't be ready for 2 or 3 years. We're only > depending on the name "Document" so whether we reference DOM3Core or > DOMCore won't make a difference to implementers. Once DOMCore becomes > stable, we could easily rev page visibility to reference it. You reference HTML. HTML depends on DOM Core. Lets not play games. ;-) -- Anne van Kesteren http://annevankesteren.nl/
Received on Sunday, 24 July 2011 02:59:39 UTC