Re: [PageVisibility] Feedback

On Sat, 2011-07-23 at 19:58 -0700, Anne van Kesteren wrote:
> On Sat, 23 Jul 2011 15:29:42 -0700, Philippe Le Hegaret <plh@w3.org> wrote:
> > On Fri, 2011-07-22 at 23:11 +0200, Anne van Kesteren wrote:
> >> 4. I think it would be better if the DOM dependency was on
> >> http://dvcs.w3.org/hg/domcore/raw-file/tip/Overview.html as that is what
> >> we want implementors to implement.
> >
> > Ideally yes, but that spec won't be ready for 2 or 3 years. We're only
> > depending on the name "Document" so whether we reference DOM3Core or
> > DOMCore won't make a difference to implementers. Once DOMCore becomes
> > stable, we could easily rev page visibility to reference it.
> 
> You reference HTML. HTML depends on DOM Core. Lets not play games. ;-)

Yes, and we're going to ask for an exception for that one. We only
reference HTML5 for its top level browsing context definition.

Philippe

Received on Sunday, 24 July 2011 11:16:57 UTC