Re: Blocker for PR: links to HTML5 spec

On Thu, 24 Feb 2011 17:44:28 +0100, Philippe Le Hegaret <> wrote:
> On Thu, 2011-02-24 at 17:28 +0100, Anne van Kesteren wrote:
>> Also, I'm not really convinced that watering down all conformance  
>> criteria is really the best approach here. If we care about  
>> interoperability that
>> is.
> Why would we water down the conformance criteria? I don't think I
> suggested that. We already have tests and 2 implementations in fact and
> this discussion should have no impact on that at least.

If you remove HTML as a dependency many important aspects will become  
non-normative or undefined, in effect, right? Non-normative and undefined  
material cannot be tested.

Anne van Kesteren

Received on Thursday, 24 February 2011 16:56:12 UTC