- From: Philippe Le Hegaret <plh@w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 24 Feb 2011 11:44:28 -0500
- To: Anne van Kesteren <annevk@opera.com>
- Cc: public-web-perf <public-web-perf@w3.org>
On Thu, 2011-02-24 at 17:28 +0100, Anne van Kesteren wrote: > On Thu, 24 Feb 2011 17:22:56 +0100, Philippe Le Hegaret <plh@w3.org> wrote: > > One blocker that we haven't talked about but is going to bite us when > > we're going to move to PR is the references to the HTML5 specification. > > We aren't supposed to reference a moving draft from a w3c recommendation > > since it's supposed to be stable. > > This would be a blocker for REC, not PR, right? At least that's what > happened with Selectors... You're correct. > Also, I'm not really convinced that watering down all conformance criteria > is really the best approach here. If we care about interoperability that > is. Why would we water down the conformance criteria? I don't think I suggested that. We already have tests and 2 implementations in fact and this discussion should have no impact on that at least. Philippe
Received on Thursday, 24 February 2011 16:44:35 UTC