- From: Philippe Le Hegaret <plh@w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 24 Feb 2011 12:14:04 -0500
- To: Anne van Kesteren <annevk@opera.com>
- Cc: public-web-perf <public-web-perf@w3.org>
On Thu, 2011-02-24 at 17:55 +0100, Anne van Kesteren wrote: > On Thu, 24 Feb 2011 17:44:28 +0100, Philippe Le Hegaret <plh@w3.org> wrote: > > On Thu, 2011-02-24 at 17:28 +0100, Anne van Kesteren wrote: > >> Also, I'm not really convinced that watering down all conformance > >> criteria is really the best approach here. If we care about > >> interoperability that > >> is. > > > > Why would we water down the conformance criteria? I don't think I > > suggested that. We already have tests and 2 implementations in fact and > > this discussion should have no impact on that at least. > > If you remove HTML as a dependency many important aspects will become > non-normative or undefined, in effect, right? Non-normative and undefined > material cannot be tested. Ah, but we would add the necessary bits in the specification before removing the normative dependency as part of an appendix. I don't know if that's feasible, thus my question to Zhiheng. Philippe
Received on Thursday, 24 February 2011 17:14:11 UTC