- From: Anne van Kesteren <annevk@opera.com>
- Date: Thu, 24 Feb 2011 17:28:58 +0100
- To: public-web-perf <public-web-perf@w3.org>, "Philippe Le Hegaret" <plh@w3.org>
On Thu, 24 Feb 2011 17:22:56 +0100, Philippe Le Hegaret <plh@w3.org> wrote: > One blocker that we haven't talked about but is going to bite us when > we're going to move to PR is the references to the HTML5 specification. > We aren't supposed to reference a moving draft from a w3c recommendation > since it's supposed to be stable. This would be a blocker for REC, not PR, right? At least that's what happened with Selectors... Also, I'm not really convinced that watering down all conformance criteria is really the best approach here. If we care about interoperability that is. -- Anne van Kesteren http://annevankesteren.nl/
Received on Thursday, 24 February 2011 16:29:34 UTC