- From: Kis, Zoltan <zoltan.kis@intel.com>
- Date: Mon, 23 May 2016 15:46:33 +0300
- To: Adrian Hope-Bailie <adrian@hopebailie.com>
- Cc: Timothy Holborn <timothy.holborn@gmail.com>, "public-web-of-things@w3.org" <public-web-of-things@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <CANrNqUcR+CnF2F1=MUkR+U4ND-Df2qF3fP3v-eFJbBJb6Y+Z_A@mail.gmail.com>
I think it is obvious that the Physical Web concept, and beacons in general, are already in scope of the WoT IG, as Dave described. The Physical Web concept leaves the data model open, and provides means for discovery, retrieve, update, and notify, but not for remote creation and deletion of things (or resources in OCF terminology). Attached 2 slides I made out of this. For instance, with the Physical Web one could use BLE services and characteristics: https://developer.bluetooth.org/gatt/services/Pages/ServicesHome.aspx https://developer.bluetooth.org/gatt/characteristics/Pages/CharacteristicsHome.aspx or other, proprietary or standardized data models. Anyone can well implement their own Physical Web. I agree with Dave that the most important concept to deal with here (in relation to discovery+CRUDN) is that of user agents. Do I understand right that Timothy you'd like to add support for control on what things (services) can be discovered and accessed by a given device identity + capabilities + permissions + interests, sort of "service agents", for instance things/resource directories? Best regards, Zoltan On Mon, May 23, 2016 at 3:01 PM, Adrian Hope-Bailie <adrian@hopebailie.com> wrote: > Check out the Physical Web project > http://google.github.io/physical-web/ > > On 22 May 2016 at 11:11, Timothy Holborn <timothy.holborn@gmail.com> > wrote: > >> Looking into iBeacon technology and found the google offering [1] >> alongside the apple version. >> >> I'd rather have the infrastructure owned by the property owner and use >> linked-data more generically (rather than via service provider). Any >> suggested links for existing solutions that are less service-provider / >> vendor tied? >> >> I also found the paypal beacon [2] which also looked interesting, >> pondering whether bluetooth ble's might be usable as a 2-part hardware >> token that people might carry on their keychains (amongst the many other >> uses)... >> >> Tim.H. >> >> [1] https://github.com/google/eddystone >> [2] >> http://blog.verifone.com/apple-ibeacon-paypal-beacon-and-ble-what-does-it-all-mean/ >> >> >
Attachments
- image/jpeg attachment: Provisioning_IoT_with_Web_NFC__-_Physical_Web_1.jpg
- image/jpeg attachment: Provisioning_IoT_with_Web_NFC_-_Physical_Web_2.jpg
Received on Monday, 23 May 2016 12:58:47 UTC