- From: Greg Billock <gbillock@google.com>
- Date: Wed, 16 May 2012 18:57:32 -0700
- To: James Hawkins <jhawkins@chromium.org>
- Cc: Dave Raggett <dsr@w3.org>, Robin Berjon <robin@berjon.com>, "public-web-intents@w3.org" <public-web-intents@w3.org>
Agreed. I think we're ready to go. Something I'd really appreciate is a critical editing pass from someone skilled in the arts of spec-writing. I think there's a spec in all that text, but making it pop out is something I'd like assistance with, if you have time or nominations. :-) Web-apps folks also sound eager to move to FPWD. What do we do next! On Thu, May 3, 2012 at 11:19 AM, James Hawkins <jhawkins@chromium.org> wrote: > I think we should consider these as separate issues (FPWD and finding a > common home for WI/R*H) so we can continue moving forward with the active > development of WI. Eventually we'll solve the latter parenthetical, but > that is a large undertaking. > > James > > > On Fri, Apr 27, 2012 at 3:38 AM, Dave Raggett <dsr@w3.org> wrote: >> >> Where does this leave us with steps towards a first public working >> draft? What about Ian's suggestion for moving the existing >> register*Handler() stuff to the same spec as intents? >> >> Ian said: >> >> > From a purely spec-editorial perspective, it seems to make more sense to >> > have all of this in one spec, rather than split across multiple specs. >> > If >> > you would like, I'd be willing to spec this all in the HTML spec (which >> > would especially make sense if we do add another element); >> > alternatively, >> > we should really consider moving the existing register*Handler() stuff >> > to >> > the same spec as the intent stuff. >> >> see >> http://lists.whatwg.org/pipermail/whatwg-whatwg.org/2012-April/035301.html >> >> >> -- >> Dave Raggett <dsr@w3.org> http://www.w3.org/People/Raggett > >
Received on Thursday, 17 May 2012 01:58:02 UTC