Re: FPWD for web intents, was Re: Face to face with DAP?

I think we should consider these as separate issues (FPWD and finding a
common home for WI/R*H) so we can continue moving forward with the active
development of WI.  Eventually we'll solve the latter parenthetical, but
that is a large undertaking.

James

On Fri, Apr 27, 2012 at 3:38 AM, Dave Raggett <dsr@w3.org> wrote:

> Where does this leave us with steps towards a first public working
> draft?  What about Ian's suggestion for moving the existing
> register*Handler() stuff to the same spec as intents?
>
> Ian said:
>
> > From a purely spec-editorial perspective, it seems to make more sense to
> > have all of this in one spec, rather than split across multiple specs. If
> > you would like, I'd be willing to spec this all in the HTML spec (which
> > would especially make sense if we do add another element); alternatively,
> > we should really consider moving the existing register*Handler() stuff to
> > the same spec as the intent stuff.
>
> see
> http://lists.whatwg.org/pipermail/whatwg-whatwg.org/2012-April/035301.html
>
>
> --
> Dave Raggett <dsr@w3.org> http://www.w3.org/People/Raggett
>