Re: FPWD for web intents, was Re: Face to face with DAP?

I am happy to have a go starting tomorrow or Thursday at the latest.

On 17/05/12 02:57, Greg Billock wrote:
> Agreed. I think we're ready to go. Something I'd really appreciate is
> a critical editing pass from someone skilled in the arts of
> spec-writing. I think there's a spec in all that text, but making it
> pop out is something I'd like assistance with, if you have time or
> nominations. :-)
> 
> Web-apps folks also sound eager to move to FPWD. What do we do next!
> 
> 
> On Thu, May 3, 2012 at 11:19 AM, James Hawkins <jhawkins@chromium.org> wrote:
>> I think we should consider these as separate issues (FPWD and finding a
>> common home for WI/R*H) so we can continue moving forward with the active
>> development of WI.  Eventually we'll solve the latter parenthetical, but
>> that is a large undertaking.
>>
>> James
>>
>>
>> On Fri, Apr 27, 2012 at 3:38 AM, Dave Raggett <dsr@w3.org> wrote:
>>>
>>> Where does this leave us with steps towards a first public working
>>> draft?  What about Ian's suggestion for moving the existing
>>> register*Handler() stuff to the same spec as intents?
>>>
>>> Ian said:
>>>
>>>> From a purely spec-editorial perspective, it seems to make more sense to
>>>> have all of this in one spec, rather than split across multiple specs.
>>>> If
>>>> you would like, I'd be willing to spec this all in the HTML spec (which
>>>> would especially make sense if we do add another element);
>>>> alternatively,
>>>> we should really consider moving the existing register*Handler() stuff
>>>> to
>>>> the same spec as the intent stuff.
>>>
>>> see
>>> http://lists.whatwg.org/pipermail/whatwg-whatwg.org/2012-April/035301.html
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> Dave Raggett <dsr@w3.org> http://www.w3.org/People/Raggett
>>
>>
> 


-- 
Dave Raggett <dsr@w3.org> http://www.w3.org/People/Raggett

Received on Tuesday, 22 May 2012 12:25:28 UTC