- From: Jeffrey Yasskin via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 07 Apr 2015 01:16:07 +0000
- To: public-web-bluetooth-log@w3.org
I think this is all just wordsmithing, so I'd rather not spend the time iterating on it, even though I don't have any objections to the content. I expect we can explain in emails that the informal processes are preferred, instead of relying on the charter to explain it. @marcoscaceres or others with more W3C experience than I have, let me know if you disagree and want to take this. --- --- <sup>**[charter.md, line 100 \[r1\]](https://reviewable.io:443/reviews/webbluetoothcg/web-bluetooth/99#-JmGPdPjQm0GjC4oAi1_)** ([raw file](https://github.com/webbluetoothcg/web-bluetooth/blob/712f6b9f239d3955e9b367dde12aa57a1016f2e8/charter.md#L100)):</sup> This is something the editors will have to pay attention to when accepting changes, but the [CONTRIBUTING](https://github.com/WebBluetoothCG/web-bluetooth/blob/charter/CONTRIBUTING.md) file is clear about it too, so having it in the charter too probably isn't necessary. --- --- Comments from the [review on Reviewable.io](https://reviewable.io:443/reviews/webbluetoothcg/web-bluetooth/99) <!-- Sent from Reviewable.io --> -- GitHub Notif of comment by jyasskin See https://github.com/WebBluetoothCG/web-bluetooth/pull/99#issuecomment-90303538
Received on Tuesday, 7 April 2015 01:16:20 UTC