W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-web-bluetooth-log@w3.org > April 2015

Re: [web-bluetooth] updates for consistency with template

From: Jeffrey Yasskin via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
Date: Tue, 07 Apr 2015 01:16:07 +0000
To: public-web-bluetooth-log@w3.org
Message-ID: <issue_comment.created-90303538-1428369365-sysbot+gh@w3.org>
I think this is all just wordsmithing, so I'd rather not spend the 
time iterating on it, even though I don't have any objections to the 
content. I expect we can explain in emails that the informal processes
 are preferred, instead of relying on the charter to explain it.

@marcoscaceres or others with more W3C experience than I have, let me 
know if you disagree and want to take this.

---



---

<sup>**[charter.md, line 100 
\[r1\]](https://reviewable.io:443/reviews/webbluetoothcg/web-bluetooth/99#-JmGPdPjQm0GjC4oAi1_)**
 ([raw 
file](https://github.com/webbluetoothcg/web-bluetooth/blob/712f6b9f239d3955e9b367dde12aa57a1016f2e8/charter.md#L100)):</sup>
This is something the editors will have to pay attention to when 
accepting changes, but the 
[CONTRIBUTING](https://github.com/WebBluetoothCG/web-bluetooth/blob/charter/CONTRIBUTING.md)
 file is clear about it too, so having it in the charter too probably 
isn't necessary.

---


---

Comments from the [review on 
Reviewable.io](https://reviewable.io:443/reviews/webbluetoothcg/web-bluetooth/99)
<!-- Sent from Reviewable.io -->


-- 
GitHub Notif of comment by jyasskin
See 
https://github.com/WebBluetoothCG/web-bluetooth/pull/99#issuecomment-90303538
Received on Tuesday, 7 April 2015 01:16:20 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 7 April 2015 01:16:20 UTC