Re: [apis] feedback from TPAC face-to-face meeting

Hi Bin,

On 21 Nov 2013, at 03:56, HU, BIN <bh526r@att.com> wrote:

> With regard to my 2 action items (I guess it's part of the danger of being absent :), would you help me understand what type of clarification is needed under what context so that I can try to improve it?

The minutes will have (some) more information:
http://www.w3.org/2013/11/12-webtv-minutes

For Service Expiry, there was feedback from several members of the group that it was too vague in its wording and thus hard to analyse. Quite possibly, what is needed is to explain how this requirement relates to use cases.

For Local Access Control, the question was whether this was a requirement that is already well implemented at the application level, but maybe abstracting the capability would be worth standardising. Feedback from the group (MarkV in particular) was that the requirement could use wording to make that clear.

HTH,
Olivier

-----------------------------
http://www.bbc.co.uk
This e-mail (and any attachments) is confidential and 
may contain personal views which are not the views of the BBC unless specifically stated.
If you have received it in 
error, please delete it from your system.
Do not use, copy or disclose the 
information in any way nor act in reliance on it and notify the sender 
immediately.
Please note that the BBC monitors e-mails 
sent or received.
Further communication will signify your consent to 
this.
-----------------------------

Received on Thursday, 21 November 2013 09:12:52 UTC