- From: HU, BIN <bh526r@att.com>
- Date: Thu, 21 Nov 2013 03:56:25 +0000
- To: Olivier Thereaux <Olivier.Thereaux@bbc.co.uk>, public-web-and-tv <public-web-and-tv@w3.org>
Olivier, Thank you very much for the good summary of the discussion in TPAC. With regard to my 2 action items (I guess it's part of the danger of being absent :), would you help me understand what type of clarification is needed under what context so that I can try to improve it? Thank you very much Bin -----Original Message----- From: Olivier Thereaux [mailto:Olivier.Thereaux@bbc.co.uk] Sent: Wednesday, November 20, 2013 1:34 AM To: public-web-and-tv Cc: HU, BIN Subject: [apis] feedback from TPAC face-to-face meeting Dear all, Last week, the web and TV IG had a face-to-face meeting as part of the W3C TPAC event in Shenzhen, China. The minutes of the meeting are at: http://www.w3.org/2013/11/12-webtv-minutes We had two sessions related to Media APIs: * A short report on the status of the TF * A walk through the current gap analysis The discussion was fruitful, and I encourage you to go read the minutes. Among the outcomes of the meeting, I will note the following: 1. The work of the TF will continue, and we will try and finish the current iteration of tech gap analysis soon. JC is working with the IG chairs on plan and guidelines for future iterations. 2. There were requests for clarification of two of the requirements: Service Expiry (ACTION-168) and Local Access Control (ACTION-169). I have done a bit of archaeology and believe you were the initial contributor for those, Bin. I have taken the liberty to assign the two action items to you. 3. A look at the current state of the gap analysis showed a clear gap for tuner control and channel identification. It was suggested that the TF should spin off this work into its own CG, which would take the Use Cases/Requirements as input to start working on draft spec(s). I would recommend that the TF take the minutes of the meeting as input for the next teleconference. The feedback was generally very positive, and there is support from the rest of the IG for the TF to move forward with feedback to working groups. This concludes my action item ACTION-173 (Bring back f2f feedback to media apis tf,delegate action-168 and action-169). Best, -- Olivier ----------------------------- http://www.bbc.co.uk This e-mail (and any attachments) is confidential and may contain personal views which are not the views of the BBC unless specifically stated. If you have received it in error, please delete it from your system. Do not use, copy or disclose the information in any way nor act in reliance on it and notify the sender immediately. Please note that the BBC monitors e-mails sent or received. Further communication will signify your consent to this. -----------------------------
Received on Thursday, 21 November 2013 03:57:36 UTC