Re: [tt] Updated draft input to the proposed revision of Timed Text WG charter

Actually, despite the title of the email, I was thinking of this statement more as a draft of requirements from the IG (which is the normal function of the IG), than as a Charter review (an AC function).

I agree that a simple statement that the IG supports the TTML WG draft Charter would make sense in addition, though if more of our requirements were incorporated into the Charter, all the better.

Perhaps Pierre or the IG chairs should post an email on the TTML Charter review discussion thread endorsing the new Charter on behalf of the IG and providing a link to this page?

Thanks,
mav



On May 31, 2013, at 6:23 AM, "Silvia Pfeiffer" <silviapfeiffer1@gmail.com> wrote:

> Hi all,
> 
> I think the wiki statement should go a step further and provide an
> actual charter review.
> 
> The wiki currently suggests three different strategies that the W3C
> could take to deal with two timed text formats:
> 1. development of mappings
> 2. develop one true timed text format
> 3. requirement to support both both
> 
> In contrast, the TTWG charter is a step ahead of these proposed
> strategies and is proposing to go with strategy 1:
> " Establish a semantic mapping between TTML and WebVTT in order to
> facilitate browser implementation and market adoption."
> 
> Thus, I think we should be more clear in our review and clearly state
> that we are ok with the new charter because it meets the requirements
> that this group came up with given that there are two formats.
> 
> HTH.
> 
> Regards,
> Silvia.
> 
> 
> On Fri, May 31, 2013 at 3:26 AM, Pierre-Anthony Lemieux
> <pal@sandflow.com> wrote:
>> Good morning/evening,
>> 
>> Please find at [1] the output of our call earlier today -- thanks to
>> Mark Vickers for the live editing.
>> 
>> [1] http://www.w3.org/2011/webtv/wiki/TTWG_Consensus_Input
>> 
>> Please indicate your concerns/comments on this reflector or at the
>> bottom of the wiki page.
>> 
>> Unless significant concerns are raised, the text is intended to be
>> made available as consensus input of this group to the proposed
>> revision of Timed Text WG charter.
>> 
>> Best,
>> 
>> -- Pierre
>

Received on Tuesday, 4 June 2013 15:20:33 UTC