- From: Michael Dolan <mdolan@newtbt.com>
- Date: Tue, 4 Jun 2013 09:26:59 -0700
- To: <public-web-and-tv@w3.org>
Pierre and all- Sorry I was unable to join the call. Regarding: The Web & TV IG recommends the following requirements for W3C Timed Text efforts: In discussions offline, I understand that the enumeration is more of a list of possible viable strategies, not a list of requirements - all of which must be met as is implied. Meeting all of these "requirements" may not be possible or necessary depending on the use cases and requirements that emerge. If my understanding is accurate, then I propose the above sentence be changed to: The Web & TV IG recommends that the W3C Timed Text Working Group investigate the following harmonization strategies: Regards, Mike -----Original Message----- From: Pierre-Anthony Lemieux [mailto:pal@sandflow.com] Sent: Thursday, May 30, 2013 10:26 AM To: public-web-and-tv@w3.org Subject: [tt] Updated draft input to the proposed revision of Timed Text WG charter Good morning/evening, Please find at [1] the output of our call earlier today -- thanks to Mark Vickers for the live editing. [1] http://www.w3.org/2011/webtv/wiki/TTWG_Consensus_Input Please indicate your concerns/comments on this reflector or at the bottom of the wiki page. Unless significant concerns are raised, the text is intended to be made available as consensus input of this group to the proposed revision of Timed Text WG charter. Best, -- Pierre
Received on Tuesday, 4 June 2013 16:27:30 UTC