Re: webtv-ISSUE-66 (gps): Web&TV poll for spec priorities [testing]

On Wed, 03 Apr 2013 14:33:17 +0300, Giuseppe Pascale <giuseppep@opera.com>  
wrote:

> On Wed, 03 Apr 2013 05:05:37 +0200, Vickers, Mark  
> <Mark_Vickers@cable.comcast.com> wrote:
>
>> I also think we should send the poll to the Core Mob team and make sure  
>> our current understanding is correct.
>>
>
> I actually think we should remove the coremob column from our finial  
> result, as we are only interested in our community at this stage. Of  
> course when we submit our input to the Testing Group that will be  
> complemented with input comming from other groups, e.g. the coremob  
> group.

Agree.

Chaals the lurker.

> /g
>
>> On Apr 2, 2013, at 8:25 AM, Clarke Stevens <C.Stevens@CableLabs.com>  
>> wrote:
>>
>>> I think that's a good question. I'll add it to the agenda.
>>>
>>> -Clarke
>>>
>>> On 4/2/13 6:44 AM, "Web and TV Interest Group Issue Tracker"
>>> <sysbot+tracker@w3.org> wrote:
>>>
>>>> webtv-ISSUE-66 (gps): Web&TV poll for spec priorities [testing]
>>>>
>>>> http://www.w3.org/2011/webtv/track/issues/66
>>>>
>>>> Raised by: Giuseppe Pascale
>>>> On product: testing
>>>>
>>>> I was wondering if we need to run also an internal poll to gather
>>>> feedback from web&tv participants on the priorities of testing a  
>>>> number
>>>> of W3C specifications, the same way we are doing for external
>>>> organizations.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>
>


-- 
Charles McCathie Nevile - Consultant (web standards) CTO Office, Yandex
       chaals@yandex-team.ru         Find more at http://yandex.com

Received on Wednesday, 3 April 2013 13:24:39 UTC