Re: webtv-ISSUE-66 (gps): Web&TV poll for spec priorities [testing]

On Apr 3, 2013, at 8:23 AM, Charles McCathie Nevile <chaals@yandex-team.ru> wrote:

> On Wed, 03 Apr 2013 14:33:17 +0300, Giuseppe Pascale <giuseppep@opera.com> wrote:
> 
>> On Wed, 03 Apr 2013 05:05:37 +0200, Vickers, Mark <Mark_Vickers@cable.comcast.com> wrote:
>> 
>>> I also think we should send the poll to the Core Mob team and make sure our current understanding is correct.
>>> 
>> 
>> I actually think we should remove the coremob column from our finial result, as we are only interested in our community at this stage. Of course when we submit our input to the Testing Group that will be complemented with input comming from other groups, e.g. the coremob group.
> 
> Agree.
> 
> Chaals the lurker.

I still think we should send this to the CoreMob group for the following reasons:
1. I consider mobile to be a target of everything we do in TV. The "TV Everywhere" movement is mostly about extending TV to tablets and phones. So, it's relevant to Web&TV IG. (The "TV" in "Web&TV" includes "TV services", not only "TV sets"!)
2. We've changed the table significantly. Wee've added rows and columns and broadened the values from a single checkbox. The old input from CoreMob to the old table can't simply be carried over. It needs updating.
3. We had the start of a good discussion with the CoreMob team at the January meeting and took an action item to discuss differences and move towards increasing commonality. Sending this table to CoreMob addresses that action item.
4. The Web&TV IG plans to give up control of this table to one of Tobie's central testing groups after this poll, so it will be in a neutral place going forward.

We should probably explain these points to the CoreMob group when we send it to them. If you cc me when you send it, I'll add the above comments, if you prefer.

> 
>> /g
>> 
>>> On Apr 2, 2013, at 8:25 AM, Clarke Stevens <C.Stevens@CableLabs.com> wrote:
>>> 
>>>> I think that's a good question. I'll add it to the agenda.
>>>> 
>>>> -Clarke
>>>> 
>>>> On 4/2/13 6:44 AM, "Web and TV Interest Group Issue Tracker"
>>>> <sysbot+tracker@w3.org> wrote:
>>>> 
>>>>> webtv-ISSUE-66 (gps): Web&TV poll for spec priorities [testing]
>>>>> 
>>>>> http://www.w3.org/2011/webtv/track/issues/66
>>>>> 
>>>>> Raised by: Giuseppe Pascale
>>>>> On product: testing
>>>>> 
>>>>> I was wondering if we need to run also an internal poll to gather
>>>>> feedback from web&tv participants on the priorities of testing a number
>>>>> of W3C specifications, the same way we are doing for external
>>>>> organizations.
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>> 
>> 
>> 
> 
> 
> -- 
> Charles McCathie Nevile - Consultant (web standards) CTO Office, Yandex
>      chaals@yandex-team.ru         Find more at http://yandex.com

Received on Sunday, 7 April 2013 21:16:11 UTC