- From: Giuseppe Pascale <giuseppep@opera.com>
- Date: Wed, 03 Apr 2013 13:33:17 +0200
- To: "Clarke Stevens" <c.stevens@cablelabs.com>, "Vickers, Mark" <Mark_Vickers@cable.comcast.com>
- Cc: "Web and TV Interest Group" <public-web-and-tv@w3.org>
On Wed, 03 Apr 2013 05:05:37 +0200, Vickers, Mark <Mark_Vickers@cable.comcast.com> wrote: > I also think we should send the poll to the Core Mob team and make sure > our current understanding is correct. > I actually think we should remove the coremob column from our finial result, as we are only interested in our community at this stage. Of course when we submit our input to the Testing Group that will be complemented with input comming from other groups, e.g. the coremob group. /g > On Apr 2, 2013, at 8:25 AM, Clarke Stevens <C.Stevens@CableLabs.com> > wrote: > >> I think that's a good question. I'll add it to the agenda. >> >> -Clarke >> >> On 4/2/13 6:44 AM, "Web and TV Interest Group Issue Tracker" >> <sysbot+tracker@w3.org> wrote: >> >>> webtv-ISSUE-66 (gps): Web&TV poll for spec priorities [testing] >>> >>> http://www.w3.org/2011/webtv/track/issues/66 >>> >>> Raised by: Giuseppe Pascale >>> On product: testing >>> >>> I was wondering if we need to run also an internal poll to gather >>> feedback from web&tv participants on the priorities of testing a number >>> of W3C specifications, the same way we are doing for external >>> organizations. >>> >>> >>> >> >> > -- Giuseppe Pascale Product Manager TV & Connected Devices Opera Software
Received on Wednesday, 3 April 2013 11:35:36 UTC