- From: Igarashi, Tatsuya <Tatsuya.Igarashi@jp.sony.com>
- Date: Tue, 10 May 2011 21:34:59 +0900
- To: Hiroyuki Aizu <hiroyuki.aizu@toshiba.co.jp>, Giuseppe Pascale <giuseppep@opera.com>
- CC: "public-web-and-tv@w3.org" <public-web-and-tv@w3.org>
I second the Aizu-san's opinion. I prefer starting at 13:00UTC (22:00JST), too. -***---***---***---***---***---***---***---***---***--***---***---***- Tatsuya Igarashi (Tatsuya.Igarashi@jp.sony.com) NS Development Dept. Technology Development Group Sony Corporation (Voice) +81-3-5435-3252 (Fax) +81-3-5435-3274 > -----Original Message----- > From: public-web-and-tv-request@w3.org > [mailto:public-web-and-tv-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Hiroyuki Aizu > Sent: Tuesday, May 10, 2011 7:10 PM > To: Giuseppe Pascale > Cc: public-web-and-tv@w3.org > Subject: Re: [HOME_NETWORK_TF] Re: HNTF call reschedule... > > I support the 1hr weekly call option. > It's preferable to start call at 13:00 UTC, if possible. > > Thanks. > > Hiroyuki Aizu > TOSHIBA > > On Fri, 06 May 2011 22:04:28 +0900, Giuseppe Pascale <giuseppep@opera.com> > wrote: > > > On Fri, 06 May 2011 11:52:41 +0200, Francois Daoust <fd@w3.org> wrote: > > > >> On 05/03/2011 06:26 PM, Russell Berkoff wrote: > >>> Hello, > >>> > >>> I will not be able to attend a HTNF call rescheduled for next week > >>> (5/10). > >> > >> Understood. I also forgot to prepare the questionnaire, but given the > >> above, I suggest we make do without it and use the other possibility > >> mentioned during last call, in other words reschedule next call on > >> Tuesday 24 May 2011 (and revert back to the usual bi-weekly schedule > >> afterwards). > >> > >> In short and clear: > >> - Tuesday 10 May 2011: No HNTF call > >> - Tuesday 17 May 2011: No HNTF call > >> - Tuesday 24 May 2011: HNTF call at 14:00 UTC > >> - Tuesday 31 May 2011: HNTF call at 14:00 UTC > >> > > > > Works for me. > > I would also ask TF participants to evaluate if it would be better to > > change the bi-weekly 1.5h call in a weekly 1h call. > > This will allow us to proceed faster and should solve some schedule > > conflicts that were highlighted during our first call. > > > > /g >
Received on Tuesday, 10 May 2011 12:35:32 UTC