- From: Philippe Le Hegaret <plh@w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 15 Feb 2011 19:59:11 -0500
- To: "Ali C. Begen (abegen)" <abegen@cisco.com>
- Cc: Silvia Pfeiffer <silviapfeiffer1@gmail.com>, Glenn Adams <glenn@skynav.com>, Jean-Claude Dufourd <jean-claude.dufourd@telecom-paristech.fr>, "Richard Maunder (rmaunder)" <rmaunder@cisco.com>, public-web-and-tv@w3.org
On Tue, 2011-02-15 at 18:40 -0500, Ali C. Begen (abegen) wrote: > I think folks need to agree on the container format not the codec type. A good container format will be good for several codecs that exist today and will yet to come. My understanding is that the IP issues surrounding the codec types are also surrounding the container formats and the streaming technologies. So, I'd be surprised if any agreement was reached within the HTML Working Group on those topics. I can't imagine a different conclusion that the H.264/Theora discussion at this point. In any case, as Glenn alluded to, HTML has been technology neutral since the beginning. Unless I'm mistaken, we don't require implementations to support a specific image format. Philippe
Received on Wednesday, 16 February 2011 00:59:22 UTC