- From: Mark Watson <watsonm@netflix.com>
- Date: Sat, 2 Apr 2011 10:16:07 -0700
- To: Alexander Adolf <alexander.adolf@me.com>
- CC: W3C Web+TV W3C Web+TV IG <public-web-and-tv@w3.org>
Sent from my iPhone On Apr 2, 2011, at 6:38 AM, "Alexander Adolf" <alexander.adolf@me.com> wrote: > Dear Steve, > > On 02 Apr, 2011,at 02:18 PM, Steve Lhomme <slhomme@matroska.org> wrote: > >> [...] >> Is there a patent pool planned for DASH ? > > I don't know. That should be part of the information that MPEG provides in response to our inquiry on DASH. > As I understand it's too soon to say. It's reasonable for companies to wait until the final stages of the process to declare IPR (when they know exactly what will be in the final spec), although in this case there are calls for early declarations. MPEG does not establish patent pools. There are private companies which establish pools, such as Via Licensing and MPEG-LA, and one of these might choose to establish a pool for DASH, although as I have argued before it seems very unlikely to me that there is a business there. ...Mark >> What would be the point of spending money on that if the technology is going to be offered free or charge in the end anyway ? > > > To keep things organised and to have a "safe harbour" for patent holders and licencees alike. Even if it's free of charge, the patent holders keep an overview of the deployment of their tech, because you are still signing a licence agreement (although it doesn't involve any payments). If things change dramatically in the future, the licensors will know whom to contact to negotiate amendments to the licence terms. > > Cheers, > > --alex
Received on Saturday, 2 April 2011 17:17:15 UTC