[webandtv] Ready to bring the draft charter to the W3C Management? (was Re: [tech] Standardize Buttons For TV-Web Remotes?)

Hi HJ and all,

Thanks for your understanding, HJ!

Even though there seems to be the following technical topics remaining
on the list:
- Compliance and Interoperability
- What kind of devices should be included in "TV-like devices"
- How to handle TV control events

I think all of those could be discussed after the IG is launched.

So I'd propose we bring the draft charter [1] to W3C Management for
review.  If anybody of you believes there are any changes that have
not been incorporated in the draft yet, please let us know on this
mailing list by 16:59, Boston time on 2010-10-18.

[1] http://www.w3.org/2010/09/webTVIGcharter.html



On 10/16/2010 12:23 AM, 이현재 wrote:
> Dear all,
> I'm obliged to say something from TV makers voice.
> Remote key arrangement is kind of TV unique features/identities from other devices and even among TV makers.
> As new technology introduced to TV world, the most necessary key is added to a certain position with a big discretion.
> As a TV expert, I can say very confidently that adding single button is very huge decision for product concept.
> Unlike IT devices having various derivatives, TV is inclined to keep its own identity relatively longer time.
> We could recommend some essential keys of web tech, however web tech is changing very quickly.
> The inertia attribute of TV remote must be respected.
> I suggested this mailing list to priortize adaptive streaming for VOD, javascript API for TV interaction, HTML profiling for TV some time ago. But I discontinued for quick IG startup.
> With this regards, I agree with Kaz that just leave current IG charter as it is.
> Best regards,
> HJ
> -----Original Message-----
> From:
> Sent: 없음
> To: Kazuyuki Ashimura
> Cc: Giuseppe Pascale; public-web-and-tv@w3.org
> Subject: Re: [tech] Standardize Buttons For TV-Web Remotes?
> On Fri, Oct 15, 2010 at 1:16 PM, Kazuyuki Ashimura<ashimura@w3.org>  wrote:
>> 2. There are various existing DTV standards which handle TV remote
>>    events (not only OIPF/HbbTV but also DVB, ATSC, ARIB (BML), ABNT,
>>    etc.).
> This may be of interest, as it's somewhat broader in scope than TV
> remote events in particular.
> I've been speaking recently with the chair of the DVB SI working
> group, which has the ultimate responsibility for (amongst other
> things) the dvb: URI scheme. I got in touch in relation to
> draft-mcroberts-dvb-uri, which is a small step in an attempt to bring
> the Internet and Broadcast communities a little closer together in
> this area.
> It's been expressed to me that there is a positive attitude towards
> collaborating with the W3C and the IETF (as appropriate) and they
> would help to fulfil a "bridging role" between the communities. I can
> pass on contact details if appropriate? (AIUI also, DVB has some
> responsibilities conferred upon it by other broadcast systems to avoid
> duplicating efforts in some areas).
> All the best,
> Mo.

Kazuyuki Ashimura / W3C Multimodal & Voice Activity Lead
mailto: ashimura@w3.org
voice: +81.466.49.1170 / fax: +81.466.49.1171

Received on Friday, 15 October 2010 19:18:52 UTC