- From: Mo McRoberts <mo.mcroberts@nexgenta.com>
- Date: Fri, 15 Oct 2010 13:16:39 +0100
- To: Giuseppe Pascale <giuseppep@opera.com>
- Cc: public-web-and-tv@w3.org, Doug Schepers <schepers@w3.org>
Hi Guiseppe, I should apologise, it wasn't my intent to direct that specifically at you as though you respresented OIPF or HbbTV -- your e-mail merely reminded me of something I'd meant to raise (though I hadn't figured out where!) and so used it as a jumping-off-point. > Given the "open" nature of W3C, there are 2 possible options: > 1. W3C define its own solution. In this case, existing (public) specs are > only interesting to have a feeling of what have already been done in this > area. > 2. These fora/consortia/groups decide to propose some of the technologies > they have defined to W3C for consideration. I think (but that's just an > opinion) that W3C will be happy to consider input from other organizations > if this is done under W3C terms of usage. I would certainly prefer to see (2) than (1), where it's grounded in actual deployments. I know for example that in the UK the venture formerly known as Project Canvas (now YouView) has incorporated the DAE into its proposition for HTML-based applications. That is to say, things are starting to appear which make use of this stuff already, and I think it would be wise first and foremost to look at existing work (and if licensing terms of specifications are a problem, attempt to resolve those issues). Apologies for any confusion! M. -- Mo McRoberts mo.mcroberts@nexgenta.com
Received on Friday, 15 October 2010 14:48:52 UTC