- From: Day, Phil <Phil.Day@ncratleos.com>
- Date: Fri, 2 Feb 2024 13:58:40 +0000
- To: Mary Jo Mueller <maryjom@us.ibm.com>, "public-wcag2ict-tf@w3.org" <public-wcag2ict-tf@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <PH0PR05MB76557B8AB07D21951D4AF90685422@PH0PR05MB7655.namprd05.prod.outlook.com>
I also prefer option 1 as it is shorter but am happy to accept option 2 if the majority vote that way. From: Mary Jo Mueller <maryjom@us.ibm.com> Date: Thursday, 1 February 2024 at 19:39 To: public-wcag2ict-tf@w3.org <public-wcag2ict-tf@w3.org> Subject: [WCAG2ICT] Please respond: Comments on Closed Functionality - which option do you prefer? Hi all, In today’s meeting I neglected to bring up one last thing on the edits to the Comments on Closed Functionality section. The last survey was split as to which proposal option to use. By a 4 to 2 vote, Option 1 (with less detail) was ZjQcmQRYFpfptBannerStart This Message Is From an External Sender This message came from outside your organization. ZjQcmQRYFpfptBannerEnd Hi all, In today’s meeting I neglected to bring up one last thing on the edits to the Comments on Closed Functionality section. The last survey was split as to which proposal option to use. By a 4 to 2 vote, Option 1 (with less detail) was preferred. Option 2 has more detail that describes some of the intricacies that closed functionality entails and Bruce had a strong preference for the second proposal with a suggested edit. Loïc also liked option 2, but is willing to go with the majority. In the survey, Bruce suggested an edit for proposal 2 and I’ve incorporated the essence of his suggestion into the PR. I also merged in the PRs we agreed on today into this branch. I need for us to come to consensus on which option to incorporate before I can merge the all of these updates into the editor’s draft. YOUR TO-DO: Please take one last look at the Comments on Closed functionality<https://urldefense.com/v3/__https:/deploy-preview-254--wcag2ict.netlify.app/*comments-on-closed-functionality__;Iw!!D5WlZnHMtQ!RKl6rHMDaI7KLDRIax06F3mzxOwP22dfopRNF28crzSns0-stxhGoHKarxqPsh45BYEcP4M2WFXR7Orntg$> section the comments in the survey<https://urldefense.com/v3/__https:/www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/55145/WCAG2ICT-closed-more-to-review/results*xq5__;Iw!!D5WlZnHMtQ!RKl6rHMDaI7KLDRIax06F3mzxOwP22dfopRNF28crzSns0-stxhGoHKarxqPsh45BYEcP4M2WFUxtjCiLQ$>. Respond to this email with your vote on which option you prefer, in case you’ve been swayed by other’s responses. Indicate whether it is a strong preference (with reasoning, if you can), and then indicate if you would be comfortable going with the majority, even if they prefer the other option. Once I have the preference, I will send out a call for consensus (CfC) so I can officially log the decision. Best regards, Mary Jo Mueller IBM Accessibility Standards Program Manager
Received on Friday, 2 February 2024 13:59:22 UTC