[WCAG2ICT] Please respond: Comments on Closed Functionality - which option do you prefer?

Hi all,

In today’s meeting I neglected to bring up one last thing on the edits to the Comments on Closed Functionality section.  The last survey was split as to which proposal option to use. By a 4 to 2 vote, Option 1 (with less detail) was preferred. Option 2 has more detail that describes some of the intricacies that closed functionality entails and Bruce had a strong preference for the second proposal with a suggested edit. Loïc also liked option 2, but is willing to go with the majority.

In the survey, Bruce suggested an edit for proposal 2 and I’ve incorporated the essence of his suggestion into the PR.  I also merged in the PRs we agreed on today into this branch. I need for us to come to consensus on which option to incorporate before I can merge the all of these updates into the editor’s draft.

YOUR TO-DO: Please take one last look at the Comments on Closed functionality<https://deploy-preview-254--wcag2ict.netlify.app/#comments-on-closed-functionality> section the comments in the survey<https://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/55145/WCAG2ICT-closed-more-to-review/results#xq5>.  Respond to this email with your vote on which option you prefer, in case you’ve been swayed by other’s responses. Indicate whether it is a strong preference (with reasoning, if you can), and then indicate if you would be comfortable going with the majority, even if they prefer the other option.

Once I have the preference, I will send out a call for consensus (CfC) so I can officially log the decision.

Best regards,

Mary Jo Mueller
IBM Accessibility Standards Program Manager