- From: Andi Snow-Weaver <andisnow@us.ibm.com>
- Date: Mon, 22 May 2006 13:21:16 -0500
- To: public-wcag-teamc@w3.org
Roger Hudson does not agree with our fundamental approach to WCAG 2.0 which is to keep the guidelines technology-neutral. His view is that the majority of Web content will continue to be implemented in XHTML for the foreseeable future and thinks we should include specific success criteria in the guidelines themselves to cover the WCAG 1.0 checkpoints that are now all mapped to SC 1.3.1. A secondary issue is that the HTML Techniques don't require <th> elements for column and row headers in simple tables. I found no old issues in Bugzilla for 1.3.1 that relate to this issue. <proposed response> If the normative guidelines include the HTML-specific success criteria, then tables, forms, headings, etc. could only conform to WCAG 2.0 if they are implemented in HTML. Tables, forms, headings, etc. implemented in any other technology, such as PDF, could not conform to WCAG 2.0. It is expected that many HTML developers will simply go directly to the HTML Techniques instead of starting with the guidelines document. With regard to the comment about why the Understanding WCAG 2.0 HTML Techniques don't include the need to use TH for tables with single levels of row and column headers, this requirement is covered in technique H51: Using table markup to present tabular information http://www.w3.org/TR/2006/WD-WCAG20-TECHS-20060427/Overview.html#H51 </proposed response> Andi
Received on Monday, 22 May 2006 18:21:29 UTC