- From: Gregg Vanderheiden <gv@trace.wisc.edu>
- Date: Fri, 2 Jun 2006 00:37:29 -0500
- To: <public-wcag-teama@w3.org>, <public-wcag-teamb@w3.org>, <public-wcag-teamc@w3.org>
Received on Friday, 2 June 2006 05:37:39 UTC
The annotated checklist gives us (and everyone else when we release it) a very easy way to evaluate our success criteria and proposed techniques. I would like people from each Task force to take the success criteria that they are assigned and - look over the annotated checklist very carefully. - pretend you are a harsh critic. - Rip up what we have. Find the holes. Releasing this can make our guidelines understandable and usable - but that can be overshadowed if we have obvious holes in it as well. Even if you know it is solid - if you think it could look like it has holes - or could be misunderstood - point that out. Do your worst. Please do it immediately. Thanks. Looking forward to finding and fixing any holes or oversights. Gregg ------------------------ Gregg C Vanderheiden Ph.D. Professor - Depts of Ind. Engr. & BioMed Engr. Director - Trace R & D Center University of Wisconsin-Madison < <http://trace.wisc.edu/> http://trace.wisc.edu/> FAX 608/262-8848 The Player for my DSS sound file is at http://tinyurl.com/dho6b <http://trace.wisc.edu:8080/mailman/listinfo/>
Received on Friday, 2 June 2006 05:37:39 UTC