- From: Christophe Strobbe <christophe.strobbe@esat.kuleuven.be>
- Date: Wed, 07 Jun 2006 14:08:34 +0200
- To: <public-wcag-teamc@w3.org>
At 07:37 2/06/2006, Gregg Vanderheiden wrote: <blockquote> The annotated checklist gives us (and everyone else when we release it) a very easy way to evaluate our success criteria and proposed techniques. I would like people from each Task force to take the success criteria that they are assigned and - look over the annotated checklist very carefully. - pretend you are a harsh critic. Rip up what we have. Find the holes. Releasing this can make our guidelines understandable and usable but that can be overshadowed if we have obvious holes in it as well. Even if you know it is solid if you think it could look like it has holes or could be misunderstood point that out. Do your worst. Please do it immediately. </blockquote> In my previous mail I forgot to mention that the User Agent and Assistive Technology Support Notes for technique H30 [1] are confusing if you read them before example 2: the notes talk about support for alt and title attributes on the img element, but the technique is about link text. Maybe something like the following should be added after the first sentence of the current text of the notes: "This also applies when images are used instead of (or in addition to) text inside links." [1] http://www.w3.org/TR/2006/WD-WCAG20-TECHS-20060427/Overview.html#H30 - Providing link text that describes the purpose of a link for anchor elements Regards, Christophe -- Christophe Strobbe K.U.Leuven - Departement of Electrical Engineering - Research Group on Document Architectures Kasteelpark Arenberg 10 - 3001 Leuven-Heverlee - BELGIUM tel: +32 16 32 85 51 http://www.docarch.be/ Disclaimer: http://www.kuleuven.be/cwis/email_disclaimer.htm
Received on Wednesday, 7 June 2006 12:08:47 UTC