- From: Andi Snow-Weaver <andisnow@us.ibm.com>
- Date: Fri, 2 Jun 2006 08:44:14 -0500
- To: public-wcag-teamc@w3.org
Does anyone have time to do this or any part of this today? My plate is
full.
Andi
----- Forwarded by Andi Snow-Weaver/Austin/IBM on 06/02/2006 08:43 AM -----
"Gregg
Vanderheiden"
<gv@trace.wisc.ed To
u> <public-wcag-teama@w3.org>,
Sent by: <public-wcag-teamb@w3.org>,
public-wcag-teamc <public-wcag-teamc@w3.org>
-request@w3.org cc
Subject
06/02/2006 12:37 CAREFUL CRITICAL review of the
AM Annotated Checklist
The annotated checklist gives us (and everyone else when we release it) a
very easy way to evaluate our success criteria and proposed techniques.
I would like people from each Task force to take the success criteria that
they are assigned and
- look over the annotated checklist very carefully.
- pretend you are a harsh critic. – Rip up what we have. Find the holes.
Releasing this can make our guidelines understandable and usable – but that
can be overshadowed if we have obvious holes in it as well.
Even if you know it is solid – if you think it could look like it has holes
– or could be misunderstood – point that out.
Do your worst. Please do it immediately.
Thanks.
Looking forward to finding and fixing any holes or oversights.
Gregg
------------------------
Gregg C Vanderheiden Ph.D.
Professor - Depts of Ind. Engr. & BioMed Engr.
Director - Trace R & D Center
University of Wisconsin-Madison
<http://trace.wisc.edu/> FAX 608/262-8848
The Player for my DSS sound file is at http://tinyurl.com/dho6b
Received on Friday, 2 June 2006 13:45:10 UTC