- From: Christophe Strobbe <christophe.strobbe@esat.kuleuven.be>
- Date: Thu, 27 Jul 2006 18:19:36 +0200
- To: public-wcag-teamc@w3.org
At 19:45 26/07/2006, Andi Snow-Weaver wrote: >Please review the proposals for the following last call issues: 668 [1], >673 [2], 674 [3], 675[4], and 677[5]. In 673, should we also consider changing "layout tables" to "a layout table"? I.e. in the proposed change: "Use of layout tables is not recommended ... are not prohibited ... the are ... If tables are used for layout, the caption element is not used." -> "The use of a layout table is not recommended ... is not prohibited ... it is/was ... If a table is used for layout, the caption element is not used." Many people find that allowing the use of a layout table in a web page is already bad enough, but giving the impression that one may use multiple layout tables in the same page might land us in hell (according to some commenters). Regards, Christophe >[1] http://www.w3.org/2006/02/lc-comments-tracker/35422/wcag20-lc/668 >[2] http://www.w3.org/2006/02/lc-comments-tracker/35422/wcag20-lc/673 >[3] http://www.w3.org/2006/02/lc-comments-tracker/35422/wcag20-lc/674 >[4] http://www.w3.org/2006/02/lc-comments-tracker/35422/wcag20-lc/675 >[5] http://www.w3.org/2006/02/lc-comments-tracker/35422/wcag20-lc/677 > >Andi -- Christophe Strobbe K.U.Leuven - Departement of Electrical Engineering - Research Group on Document Architectures Kasteelpark Arenberg 10 - 3001 Leuven-Heverlee - BELGIUM tel: +32 16 32 85 51 http://www.docarch.be/ Disclaimer: http://www.kuleuven.be/cwis/email_disclaimer.htm
Received on Thursday, 27 July 2006 16:19:44 UTC