- From: Christophe Strobbe <christophe.strobbe@esat.kuleuven.be>
- Date: Thu, 27 Jul 2006 18:38:44 +0200
- To: public-wcag-teamc@w3.org
Hi Andi, All,
At 01:25 27/07/2006, Andi Snow-Weaver wrote:
>I did manage to do two more: 678 [1] and 679 [2].
679: The proposed change to F46 is technically correct, but is the use of
scope, id, and headers attributes in layout tables a *common* failure?
>I also took a look at 680 [3] and 695 [4]. I would like to discuss these on
>Monday if we have time before attempting to make proposals on them.
>(...)
>
>In 695, Chris recommends that we should not recommend the use of the Q
>element because IE does not support it. What should we do about this one?
Either
* remove Q for now and add it again in a future version of the Techniques
doc when support has significantly improved;
or
* change example 4 (in H49) with an interim solution:
- add quotation marks manually around the Q element and
- add the following CSS to disable the display of quotation marks that
do support Q: q:before { content: ""; } q:after { content: ""; }
/* two separate rules for support in Opera 6 */
I think few people will find the second option attractive.
Regards,
Christophe
>[1] http://www.w3.org/2006/02/lc-comments-tracker/35422/wcag20-lc/678
>[2] http://www.w3.org/2006/02/lc-comments-tracker/35422/wcag20-lc/679
>[3] http://www.w3.org/2006/02/lc-comments-tracker/35422/wcag20-lc/680
>[4] http://www.w3.org/2006/02/lc-comments-tracker/35422/wcag20-lc/695
>
>Andi
--
Christophe Strobbe
K.U.Leuven - Departement of Electrical Engineering - Research Group on
Document Architectures
Kasteelpark Arenberg 10 - 3001 Leuven-Heverlee - BELGIUM
tel: +32 16 32 85 51
http://www.docarch.be/
Disclaimer: http://www.kuleuven.be/cwis/email_disclaimer.htm
Received on Thursday, 27 July 2006 16:39:00 UTC